Why you should always check to see if your business name can be trademarked. The Slants edition

Submitted by Kevin Hoda on April 22, 2015   Information Tags: , , , ,
featured image

The U.S. Court of Appeals has turned down the trademark request from Portland band “The Slants” . If you are not following the story, basically the band has been trying to get their name trademarked for the past six years, and has been denied each time. The Trademark Office is not allowing the name to be trademarked because it is deemed offensive to Asians. So much for the land of the free. The band is in a tough position. They have stated that when they go on tour, sellers will sell fake tickets with their name, as there is nothing protecting their band’s name.

The band is not giving up though. And I encourage them not too. They need to take this case to the US Supreme Court. As I have posted before, the US Government is not upholding the first amendment. They are actively trying to remove a already approved trademark from the Washington Redskins because someone was offended.  Many media companies  and popular journalist have said in public that the attack on free speech and free press in unprecedented under the current administrationRead More

Justice Department continues attack on the Redskins and free speech. What other words are offensive but not banned?

Submitted by Kevin Hoda on March 27, 2015   Commentary Tags: , , ,
featured image

“A government of laws and not of men” – John Adams

The 2nd president of the United States could not be more right. Some elected officials decided that they don’t like the name of a sport’s team, and at the stroke of a pen, the US trademark was gone. 83 years of brand building and a brand that is worth $2.4 billion could be lost if the court rules against them. Lets not forget, the Redskins did not commit any crime. They are going to lose their trademark for doing nothing illegal.

The Justice Department today released a update regarding the removal of the Washington Redskin’s trademark. According to them, the trademark is not free speech because it is commercial. Using that logic, video games and music are not protected either.

The Redskins are arguing that the US Constitution protects their free speech as much as a anyone else.

Read More